Review an AI-generated answer: break it into claims, mark which are supported, which cannot be verified and which look wrong, and get a corrected version plus a checklist of what to verify.
Check whether a claim is true, misleading or false: trace its origin, gather verifiable primary sources and get a verdict with a confidence level and links.
Analyze a contested question with the strongest version of each position, where the real disagreement lies (facts, values or predictions) and the best argument against your own view.
Turn several articles, spec sheets or reports into a comparison table where every cell names its source, with conflicts highlighted, gaps marked and a cautious conclusion.
Summarize a long report, study or contract with every point linked to its section and page, a key figures table, the author’s view kept apart from interpretation, and gaps flagged.
Plan the search for a systematic or scoping review: concept blocks, synonyms, subject headings, database-specific Boolean strings, inclusion criteria and a PRISMA log.
Find out whether an article, study or website is reliable enough for your work: authorship, funding, methods, currency and lateral reading, with a score, red flags and a verdict.
Build a survey ready for piloting: questions mapped to your goals, balanced scales, an order that avoids priming and a question-by-question bias review with fixes.
Turn a vague idea into a clear research question: a PICO breakdown, three refined versions, a scored FINER assessment, measurable variables and a hypothesis.